
Who carries out the verification of the social function?
The entity in charge of this procedure is the National Institute of Agrarian Reform, which acts within the scope of its authority to supervise, control, and regulate the use of agricultural land.
Its intervention may take place in different administrative proceedings, such as land regularization, reversion, or expropriation of rural property.
Ex officio verification
Direct identification of non-compliance
The INRA has permanent monitoring systems that allow it to detect properties that do not comply with the social or economic-social function. When irregularities are identified, the authority may initiate the process without the need for an external complaint.
Signs detected during land regularization
During technical territorial review processes, the authority may identify specific areas where there are signs of non-compliance. In such cases, an administrative procedure is activated to verify the actual situation of the property in the field.
Presence of forced labor or servitude
If there are signs or reports evidencing practices such as servitude, forced labor, or similar forms of abuse, the authority must act immediately. These situations amount to absolute non-compliance with the social function because they violate fundamental rights recognized in the Political Constitution of the State and in international human rights treaties.
Verification initiated by complaint
Complaint by public entities
Various public institutions have the duty to report possible non-compliance. These include, among others, the Authority for the Supervision and Social Control of Forests and Land and the National Service of Protected Areas, which must communicate such facts to trigger the corresponding procedures.
Complaints by social organizations
Agrarian organizations and social participation bodies exercise oversight over land use. They may request the review of properties when they believe the land does not fulfill its social purpose.
Complaint by private individuals
Any person may file a complaint, provided they supply sufficient information to identify the property, its holder, and the facts showing non-compliance. This strengthens social oversight and promotes greater transparency in land administration.
Initial stages of the procedure
Once the process has begun—whether ex officio or by complaint—the authority issues an administrative act formally opening the case. Afterwards, a date is set for a hearing in which evidence is received and a direct field verification is carried out.
This inspection is essential because it allows the authority to objectively confirm the condition of the property, its level of production, and the conditions under which the agricultural activity is being carried out.
In summary, verification of compliance with the social or economic-social function does not depend solely on third-party initiative, but also forms part of an active duty of the public administration. This mechanism ensures that land fulfills its productive purpose, respects labor rights, and contributes to the sustainable development of the rural environment.
The law firm has experience in agrarian matters and can offer specialized services in proceedings related to the social function of land, including legal advice, defense, and comprehensive support. Contact us for specialized legal advice.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is the economic-social function of land?
It is the productive and sustainable use of land, while also complying with labor and environmental standards.
Can a verification begin without a complaint?
Yes. The authority may act ex officio when it detects signs of non-compliance.
What happens if the social function is not fulfilled?
The property may become subject to proceedings such as reversion or expropriation.
Who may file a complaint?
Any person may do so, in addition to public entities and social organizations.
Is an on-site inspection mandatory?
Yes. Direct field verification is an essential stage of the procedure.
The content of this article does not reflect the technical opinion of Rigoberto Paredes & Associates and should not be considered a substitute for legal advice. The information presented herein corresponds to the date of publication and may be outdated at the time of reading. Rigoberto Paredes & Associates assumes no responsibility for keeping the information in this article up to date, as legal regulations may change over time.